🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans.

Writ petition for restoration of GST registration dismissed by High Court on account of careless attitude of petitioner in availing his right before authorities.

Petitioner was sleeping over its right after cancellation of its registration. Benefit of GST amnesty scheme denied.

Facts of Case

1. GST Registration of petitioner was cancelled on 14.01.2019 by department on account of non-filing of return for continuous period of six months.

2. Petitioner filed revocation application after 90 days, which was eventually dismissed by department.

3. Petitioner had remedy of challenging the cancellation by filing an appeal, which it did not avail.

4. There was also undue delay in filing writ petition also before High Court.

High Court

I have considered the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner. The registration of the petitioner came to be cancelled after issuing show-cause notice on 14.01.2019. The reason for cancellation of registration as found in the order dated 14.01.2019 is suo motu cancellation due to non-filing of returns. It appears that the petitioner-Company had filed an application for revocation of cancellation of registration. But, that application was also rejected as it was filed after 90 days of the order cancelling registration of the petitioner.

The petitioner had remedy of challenging cancellation of registration by filing an appeal which it has not availed.

The cancellation of registration was on 14.01.2019 and that order has attained finality. In this view of the matter, the petitioner cannot be heard to say that as now the amnesty scheme as framed by the Government and as the petitioner wants to avail the benefit of that Amnesty Scheme, the registration which was cancelled needs to be revoked.

The petitioner was sleeping over its right after cancellation of its registration.

There is undue delay even in filing an application for revocation of registration so also even in approaching this Court. The petition as such is devoid of merit and the same is accordingly dismissed.

What is the name and citation of the case ?

Replied to Anindya Bhan

Hello Sir,

You need to subscribe to our GST Library to view the full case law.

Taxpayer assigned to State GST Authorities cannot be assessed by Central GST Authorities and vice-a-versa: High Court

19 Apr 2024   5.2k

Amid GST portal deficiency, GSTN recommends extension of GSTR-1 due date for the month of March.

12 Apr 2024   4.79k

Govt defers implementation of Special Registration, Return Filing For Pan Masala, Gutkha Companies till May 15.

12 Apr 2024   4.43k

CBIC waives interest for specified taxpayers for late filing of GSTR-3B due to portal technical glitches during specified months.

9 Apr 2024   6.19k

GSTN requests taxpayers to check their email and refile their GSTR-3B within 15 days from date of email.

9 Apr 2024   10.39k

Quick Links

GST Library

Login
Register
About GST Library
Subscription (Pricing)
GST Updates
GST Calendar
GST Case Laws
GST Case Laws Sitemap
Full Site Search
GST Vides

GST Notifications
GST Act & Rules (Section-wise)
GST Act & Rules (Chapter-wise)
GST Forms
GST Forms (Category-wise)
GST Rates
Classification by CTA (Chapter-wise)
Classification by CTA (Search Tool)
E-way Bill
Finance Bill

E-invoice Applicability Calculator
Inverted Duty Refund Calculator
GST Set-off Calculator
ITC Reversal Calculator
GSTR-3B Manual
GSTR-9 Manual
GSTR-9C Manual

Others

GST e-books
GST Domains Sale
About Us
Our Services
Contact Us
Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions

taxreply.com © 2024. All Rights Reserved